Backgorund:
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) is a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia that fundamentally reshaped Australian law regarding Indigenous land rights. The case recognized the doctrine of native title for the first time and overturned the legal fiction of terra nullius—the idea that Australia was “land belonging to no one” before European colonization.
Background:
Key Issues:
The Decision:
Significance:
On Native Title:
“Native title has its origins in and is given its content by the traditional laws acknowledged by and the traditional customs observed by the Indigenous inhabitants of a territory.” (Justice Brennan)
On Terra Nullius:
“The fiction by which the rights and interests of Indigenous inhabitants in land were treated as non-existent… is a concept unacceptable in a modern society.” (Justice Brennan)
On Justice and Equality:
“The common law does not necessarily conform with all aspects of international law, but international law is a legitimate and important influence on the development of the common law, especially when international law declares the existence of universal human rights.” (Justice Brennan)